copied from one of the multitude of scathing posts i made in the VIP "FAKE CUMSHOTS ARE RESURFING" thread in that forum :

Orgasm (Wikipedia)

In Males

Two-stage model

In men, the most common way of achieving orgasm is by the stimulation of the penis.[2] This is usually accompanied by ejaculation. It is possible for a man to have an orgasm without ejaculation (known as a "dry orgasm") or to ejaculate without reaching orgasm (which may be a case of delayed ejaculation, a nocturnal emission or a case of anorgasmic ejaculation).[7][15] Men may also achieve orgasm by stimulation of the prostate (see below).[18]

"The traditional view assumes there are two stages of orgasm in males: emission following orgasm, almost instantly followed by a refractory period."[15] In 1966, Masters and Johnson published pivotal research about the phases of sexual stimulation.[1][19] Their work included women and men, and, unlike Alfred Kinsey in 1948 and 1953,[20] tried to determine the physiological stages before and after orgasm. Masters and Johnson argued that, in the first stage, "accessory organs contract and the male can feel the ejaculation coming; two to three seconds later the ejaculation occurs, which the man cannot constrain, delay, or in any way control" and that, in the second stage, "the male feels pleasurable contractions during ejaculation, reporting greater pleasure tied to a greater volume of ejaculate".[15] They reported that, unlike females, "for the man the resolution phase includes a superimposed refractory period" and added that "many males below the age of 30, but relatively few thereafter, have the ability to ejaculate frequently and are subject to only very short refractory periods during the resolution phase". Masters and Johnson equated male orgasm and ejaculation and maintained the necessity for a refractory period between orgasms.[15]

Subsequent and multiple orgasms

In contrast to the two-stage model, Kahn (1939) equalized orgasm and ejaculation and stated that several orgasms can occur and that "indeed, some men are capable of following it up with a third and a fourth".[15] Though rare, Kahn's assertion that "some men are capable of following [an orgasm] up with a third and a fourth" is supported by men who have reported having multiple, consecutive orgasms, particularly without ejaculation.[15] Males who experience dry orgasms can often produce multiple orgasms, as the refractory period is reduced.[15][21] Some men are able to masturbate for hours at a time, achieving orgasm many times.[21] Many men who began masturbation or other sexual activity prior to puberty report having been able to achieve multiple non-ejaculatory orgasms. Some evidence indicates that orgasms of men before puberty are qualitatively similar to the "normal" female experience of orgasm, suggesting that hormonal changes during puberty have a strong influence on the character of male orgasm.[22] Some men have been multiorgasmic since they can recall, while others have learned to achieve multiple orgasms.[15]

A number of studies have pointed to the hormone prolactin as the likely cause of the male refractory period. Because of this, there is currently an experimental interest in drugs which inhibit prolactin, such as cabergoline (also known as Cabeser, or Dostinex). Anecdotal reports on cabergoline suggest it may be able to eliminate the refractory period altogether, allowing men to experience multiple ejaculatory orgasms in rapid succession. At least one scientific study supports these claims,[23] although cabergoline is a hormone-altering drug and has many potential side effects. It has not been approved for treating sexual dysfunction.[23] Another possible reason for the lack or absence of a refractory period in men may be an increased infusion of the hormone oxytocin. It is believed that the amount by which oxytocin is increased may affect the length of each refractory period. A scientific study to successfully document natural, fully ejaculatory, multiple orgasms in an adult man was conducted at Rutgers University in 1995. During the study, six fully ejaculatory orgasms were experienced in 36 minutes, with no apparent refractory period.[24] It can also be said that in some cases, the refractory period can be reduced or even eliminated through the course of puberty and on into adulthood. Later, P. Haake et al. observed a single male individual producing multiple orgasms without elevated prolactin response.[25]

In recent years, a number of books have described various techniques to achieve multiple orgasms. Most multi-orgasmic men (and their partners) report that refraining from ejaculation results in a far more energetic post-orgasm state.[26] One technique for refraining from ejaculation is to put pressure on the perineum, about halfway between the scrotum and the anus, just before ejaculating to prevent ejaculation. This can, however, lead to retrograde ejaculation, i.e., redirecting semen into the urinary bladder rather than through the urethra to the outside. It may also cause long term damage due to the pressure put on the nerves and blood vessels in the perineum, akin to that reported by some males who ride bicycles with narrow seats for extended periods.[27] Men who have had prostate or bladder surgery, for whatever reason, may also experience dry orgasms because of retrograde ejaculation.

Other techniques are analogous to reports by multi-orgasmic women indicating that they must relax and "let go" to experience multiple orgasms. These techniques involve mental and physical controls over pre-ejaculatory vasocongestion and emissions, rather than ejaculatory contractions or forc'ed retention as above. Anecdotally, successful implementation of these techniques can result in continuous or multiple "full-body" orgasms.[28]


Quote

Although much is made about sexual orientation, and much tribute is paid to the hormones of youth, little is said about the Thompson Z - factor.

This scalar measures the strength of a person's desire. Thompson had the theory that many people have a low Z. But pretend otherwise. So he created a logarithmic scale to amplify the lower orders to visibility.

But that's not the clever bit. The clever bit is he made it a quaternion scalar. The two imaginary dimensions are used to efficiently capture a rotation in the sexual orthospace.

If you are bi, it really isn't that impressive if you have low Z. Because the "vector" change isn't that much about the origin. But if you are like my nephew, man, even a glance at another sex causes enough vector swing to cause some serious field warpage dude. Just total distortion. He is a mess. And it is easy to see why from his Z transform.

So I recommend that you abandon oversimplistic sexual models and at least go beyond binary. I mean, can you imagine trying to do your taxes with roman numerals?

Quote

Although much is made about sexual orientation, and much tribute is paid to the hormones of youth, little is said about the Thompson Z - factor.

...

I mean, can you imagine trying to do your taxes with roman numerals?




*watches the tiny ball curve left, follow the contour of the surface and as gravity overwhelms velocity and the orb surrenders to that slight pull tugging upon its presence slip across the verdant surface and in its final moments of existence teeter upon surface's retention of friction and then quietly fall ... disappearing for entire breath held moments into that waiting gravity trap hole in surface's appearances.

and hey

They did them in the Roman Notation across the Empire for centuries. *shrug*

*humms* ./` hey tiddley high tiddily tommy tommy too getcha hot widdley hoo diddly twat twat mohhh ./`
Quote

mmmmm interesting.did you know any sexual attraction of any kind starts threw the nose yes so try and never get your nose hurt or cut off for that matter



That is because of pheromones...silly silly Quote

In Apache culture it was common when infidelity of a wife could be proven, to cut off her nose.(not uncommon in the Blackfeet and Sioux)... Quote

In Apache culture it was common when infidelity of a wife could be proven, to cut off her nose.(not uncommon in the Blackfeet and Sioux)...



it is common in the Tribe of Monkeys to chop a male's dick off for any reason including being too short to reach the can of Pinto Beans on the top shelf.

in the Tribe of Monkey a female's nose is an object of adoration and never defaced. Quote

it is common in the Tribe of Monkeys to chop a male's dick off for any reason including being too short to reach the can of Pinto Beans on the top shelf.

in the Tribe of Monkey a female's nose is an object of adoration and never defaced.


"Monkeys Are Rad"....Eva Darkness.....Ohhhhh wrong forum sorry Quote

"Monkeys Are Rad"....Eva Darkness.....Ohhhhh wrong forum sorry


LOL (kiss) runs off to the other places to tag along
Quote

Oxford Companion to the Body: fetishism

The concept of erotic fetishism originated with the French psychologist Alfred Binet (better known for his work on intelligence testing) in an article published in 1887 in the Revue Philosophique, and was given further currency by the Italian criminologist Cesare Lombroso. However, the idea was put into wider circulation by the great collator of sexually diverse practices, Richard von Krafft-Ebing, in many editions and translations of his Psychopathia Sexualis, up to his death in 1902. He defined erotic fetishism (differing somewhat from earlier writers) as associating strong emotions of sexual pleasure with physical or mental qualities of, or even objects used by, a beloved person, and considered this part of normal sexual attraction. However, he also suggested that a predisposition to be sexually aroused by particular characteristics could be the motive for falling in love with or becoming infatuated with a specific individual associated one way or another with those characteristics, rather than an individual leading to an obsession with characteristics connected with them.

Krafft-Ebing made a distinction between what he called �physiological fetishism�, or a preference for certain particular physical characteristics in persons of the opposite sex, and what he defined as �pathological, erotic fetishism�. This was not merely directed to particular portions of the body, but extended to inanimate objects, usually articles of female apparel, or towards particular materials such as furs or velvet. But there was no hard and fast dividing line. The fetishist of the body part was stimulated by something which would normally arouse the sexual instinct, but his sexual interests were restricted to that particular part. There were also fetishists attached to some bodily part with no obvious connection to sex, and those interested in particular kinds of bodies, e.g. those exhibiting some kind of deformity. In the case of object fetishism, Krafft-Ebing noted transitional states, from �mere physiological preferences� in which intercourse with the fetish was more pleasurable, through coitus feeling less satisfactory if the fetish were not present, to complete impotence if it were absent.

Krafft-Ebing attributed the development of fetishism to some event whereby erotic feelings became associated with some particular body part or object; this is still today usually considered to play a significant part in its aetiology. While invoking environmental circumstances, he also suggested that individuals who formed these bizarre associations were predisposed to psychopathic states and excessive sexual desire, in keeping with his theories about the role of degenerate heredity and neuropathy in the aetiology of sexual disorders. Recent writers on the subject, e.g. John Bancroft in Human Sexuality and its Problems (1989), cite experimental demonstration that the male erectile response is capable of being conditioned to react to unusual stimuli. The reason why the conditioned response to particular stimuli which results in the formation of a fetish is so much more prevalent in the male may be, Bancroft suggests, because of the obviousness of penile erection. This sets up an unmissable visual and sensory link between the object of the stimulus and sexual arousal. Women may be less likely to identify pleasurable feelings invoked by certain objects or textures as specifically sexual in nature (experimental evidence demonstrating women's physiological signs of arousal, even though they denied erotic response, to sexually stimulating visual materials tends to corroborate this possibility).

The questions remain why some particular stimulus becomes the focus of erotic sensation, and why some are more likely to be conditioned than others. Fetishes are seldom completely random objects or attributes, although Bancroft points out that the particular object chosen by an individual may well have purely personal significance. There continue to be various definite areas of fetishistic interest, which, however, change over time. Krafft-Ebing considered hand-fetishism common, but Bancroft reports this as now being extremely infrequent. Feet, however, and shoes, remain an area of considerable interest. Rubber is not mentioned by Krafft- Ebing as of particular interest alongside furs, velvet, and silk, but the twentieth century saw the rise of a definite sub-group of rubber fetishists. This may be connected with the more widespread use of various rubber items for child care (sheets for changing the baby, waterproof pants, etc.). Leather and PVC also have their subcultures of devotees. This suggests that fetishes are not only psychologically determined but subject to various social influences.

The designation of particular bodily parts as sexually stimulating by particular societies could be considered as a culturally-produced form of fetishism. Certain attributes � large breasts, bound feet, a glimpse of ankle � may be preferences so deeply encoded into a particular culture's sensibility as to appear �natural� and not in need of any explanation. Therefore, a man (and fetishists are almost exclusively male) whose sexual response is very specifically tied to some such apparently universal stimulus is unlikely to consider himself as a fetishist even if interest in the stimulus greatly outweighs that towards the person whose breasts or feet they may be. If, however, he is aroused by some other body part or some unusual quality in the approved attribute (small rather than large breasts, for example), he may at least be aware of something that distinguishes him from the multitude, without describing himself as a �fetishist�.

The strict Freudian psychoanalytic interpretation of the fetish is that it represents the penis, and operates as either a protection against the fetishist's fear of castration, or a denial of the penis-less state of the woman. It seems certainly to be the case that the fetish operates as a defence against impotence if it is employed in a coital situation: it may do this by acting as a reliable stimulus to arousal and erection, or possibly more magically by its association with sexual arousal.

Not all fetishes are capable of being deployed within a reciprocal sexual relationship. Men may feel hesitant about revealing their particular quirk to a partner, or may eschew employing the fetish within marital life, going instead to prostitutes. The fetish may be associated with other minority sexual practices: in descriptions of the pleasures of rubber it is not always clear whether it is the sensation of rubber against the skin or the sense of being tightly bound in this clinging substance which is the main component of the sexual kick. Fetishism may be overtly combined with sadomasochist rituals: Maurice North, in his study of rubber fetishism, The Outer Fringe of Sex (1970) notes the pervasive elements of domination in fantasies written for the rubber market, and that rubber fetishism is but one component in a �syndrome� including boots, leather, PVC, and sadomasochistic tendencies.

While many of the statistically less common forms of sexual behaviour can be shown to have been practised by individuals throughout the course of human history, even if they were not conceptualized as sexual perversions, fetishism is not so readily detected before its identification by late-nineteenth-century sexologists. It is merely conjectural that it was the �liquefaction� of Julia's silks rather than Julia which allured Robert Herrick, that the abundant and curling tresses celebrated by poets were the real focus of attraction. Impotence occurring when the fetish was not present occasionally brought fetishism to medical attention, but in many cases its significance was probably not recognized. It has seldom figured in divorce proceedings. Krafft- Ebing noted that it did, however, have forensic implications in cases of fetishists compelled to steal the items of their desire � but, again, the erotic motivation may not have been recognized before he pointed it out. North, in his study, was writing at the time of the �Permissive Society�, when a certain degree of �kinkiness� was fashionable and designers incorporated themes (such as high boots) from the sexual underworld, but he found nevertheless that rubber fetishism was largely a hidden deviance, kept deeply secret by its practitioners because of their own shame: this may also apply to other fetishes. For example, while men may readily reveal a �normal� predilection for legs, breasts, or bottoms, it is less likely that a fondness for feet would be admitted.

While North found publications circulating among individuals sharing this obsession, there was no subculture comparable to that of homosexuals or even sadomasochists. At the time he wrote (and it is doubtful whether this has changed radically) most rubber fetishists wanted a relationship involving rubber items with a consenting female, but extremely few women were interested: and these were either prostitutes catering to a niche market, or wives or partners introduced to rubber sex by their male partners. Thus there was very little motivation to join a community which would include few potential partners, but competitors for any possible partners available. Most of the rubber fetishists investigated by North contented themselves with fantasy and masturbation, sometimes with the aid of fetish products and special-interest publications. As a very private vice, it did not have the visibility or social implications of other transgressive sexual behaviours. The incorporation of fetish motifs into mainstream fashion, and the appearance of a few fashionable fetish clubs in major urban centres, is not necessarily any indicator of a wider acceptance of fetishism.

� Lesley A. Hall

Fetische

I adore your nose girl,
it is one of so many things which drew me to you
when I first saw your face.
Now, it is You that holds me stilled;
cautious with wondering;
pithed in place.

�Throw Away Poetry� for Eva by �PinnedByMind�
� Amanda 2012
8/18/2012

Woven work here - http://fav.me/d5bmmbi

____________________________________________

I tell stories in words and music and pictures; I am a cinematographer for those who read.
- Amanda Graham -


Quote

Oxford Companion to the Body: fetishism

The concept of erotic fetishism originated with the French psychologist Alfred Binet (better known for his work on intelligence testing) in an article published in 1887 in the Revue Philosophique, and was given further currency by the Italian criminologist Cesare Lombroso. However, the idea was put into wider circulation by the great collator of sexually diverse practices, Richard von Krafft-Ebing, in many editions and translations of his Psychopathia Sexualis, up to his death in 1902. He defined erotic fetishism (differing somewhat from earlier writers) as associating strong emotions of sexual pleasure with physical or mental qualities of, or even objects used by, a beloved person, and considered this part of normal sexual attraction. However, he also suggested that a predisposition to be sexually aroused by particular characteristics could be the motive for falling in love with or becoming infatuated with a specific individual associated one way or another with those characteristics, rather than an individual leading to an obsession with characteristics connected with them.

Krafft-Ebing made a distinction between what he called �physiological fetishism�, or a preference for certain particular physical characteristics in persons of the opposite sex, and what he defined as �pathological, erotic fetishism�. This was not merely directed to particular portions of the body, but extended to inanimate objects, usually articles of female apparel, or towards particular materials such as furs or velvet. But there was no hard and fast dividing line. The fetishist of the body part was stimulated by something which would normally arouse the sexual instinct, but his sexual interests were restricted to that particular part. There were also fetishists attached to some bodily part with no obvious connection to sex, and those interested in particular kinds of bodies, e.g. those exhibiting some kind of deformity. In the case of object fetishism, Krafft-Ebing noted transitional states, from �mere physiological preferences� in which intercourse with the fetish was more pleasurable, through coitus feeling less satisfactory if the fetish were not present, to complete impotence if it were absent.

Krafft-Ebing attributed the development of fetishism to some event whereby erotic feelings became associated with some particular body part or object; this is still today usually considered to play a significant part in its aetiology. While invoking environmental circumstances, he also suggested that individuals who formed these bizarre associations were predisposed to psychopathic states and excessive sexual desire, in keeping with his theories about the role of degenerate heredity and neuropathy in the aetiology of sexual disorders. Recent writers on the subject, e.g. John Bancroft in Human Sexuality and its Problems (1989), cite experimental demonstration that the male erectile response is capable of being conditioned to react to unusual stimuli. The reason why the conditioned response to particular stimuli which results in the formation of a fetish is so much more prevalent in the male may be, Bancroft suggests, because of the obviousness of penile erection. This sets up an unmissable visual and sensory link between the object of the stimulus and sexual arousal. Women may be less likely to identify pleasurable feelings invoked by certain objects or textures as specifically sexual in nature (experimental evidence demonstrating women's physiological signs of arousal, even though they denied erotic response, to sexually stimulating visual materials tends to corroborate this possibility).

The questions remain why some particular stimulus becomes the focus of erotic sensation, and why some are more likely to be conditioned than others. Fetishes are seldom completely random objects or attributes, although Bancroft points out that the particular object chosen by an individual may well have purely personal significance. There continue to be various definite areas of fetishistic interest, which, however, change over time. Krafft-Ebing considered hand-fetishism common, but Bancroft reports this as now being extremely infrequent. Feet, however, and shoes, remain an area of considerable interest. Rubber is not mentioned by Krafft- Ebing as of particular interest alongside furs, velvet, and silk, but the twentieth century saw the rise of a definite sub-group of rubber fetishists. This may be connected with the more widespread use of various rubber items for child care (sheets for changing the baby, waterproof pants, etc.). Leather and PVC also have their subcultures of devotees. This suggests that fetishes are not only psychologically determined but subject to various social influences.

The designation of particular bodily parts as sexually stimulating by particular societies could be considered as a culturally-produced form of fetishism. Certain attributes � large breasts, bound feet, a glimpse of ankle � may be preferences so deeply encoded into a particular culture's sensibility as to appear �natural� and not in need of any explanation. Therefore, a man (and fetishists are almost exclusively male) whose sexual response is very specifically tied to some such apparently universal stimulus is unlikely to consider himself as a fetishist even if interest in the stimulus greatly outweighs that towards the person whose breasts or feet they may be. If, however, he is aroused by some other body part or some unusual quality in the approved attribute (small rather than large breasts, for example), he may at least be aware of something that distinguishes him from the multitude, without describing himself as a �fetishist�.

The strict Freudian psychoanalytic interpretation of the fetish is that it represents the penis, and operates as either a protection against the fetishist's fear of castration, or a denial of the penis-less state of the woman. It seems certainly to be the case that the fetish operates as a defence against impotence if it is employed in a coital situation: it may do this by acting as a reliable stimulus to arousal and erection, or possibly more magically by its association with sexual arousal.

Not all fetishes are capable of being deployed within a reciprocal sexual relationship. Men may feel hesitant about revealing their particular quirk to a partner, or may eschew employing the fetish within marital life, going instead to prostitutes. The fetish may be associated with other minority sexual practices: in descriptions of the pleasures of rubber it is not always clear whether it is the sensation of rubber against the skin or the sense of being tightly bound in this clinging substance which is the main component of the sexual kick. Fetishism may be overtly combined with sadomasochist rituals: Maurice North, in his study of rubber fetishism, The Outer Fringe of Sex (1970) notes the pervasive elements of domination in fantasies written for the rubber market, and that rubber fetishism is but one component in a �syndrome� including boots, leather, PVC, and sadomasochistic tendencies.

While many of the statistically less common forms of sexual behaviour can be shown to have been practised by individuals throughout the course of human history, even if they were not conceptualized as sexual perversions, fetishism is not so readily detected before its identification by late-nineteenth-century sexologists. It is merely conjectural that it was the �liquefaction� of Julia's silks rather than Julia which allured Robert Herrick, that the abundant and curling tresses celebrated by poets were the real focus of attraction. Impotence occurring when the fetish was not present occasionally brought fetishism to medical attention, but in many cases its significance was probably not recognized. It has seldom figured in divorce proceedings. Krafft- Ebing noted that it did, however, have forensic implications in cases of fetishists compelled to steal the items of their desire � but, again, the erotic motivation may not have been recognized before he pointed it out. North, in his study, was writing at the time of the �Permissive Society�, when a certain degree of �kinkiness� was fashionable and designers incorporated themes (such as high boots) from the sexual underworld, but he found nevertheless that rubber fetishism was largely a hidden deviance, kept deeply secret by its practitioners because of their own shame: this may also apply to other fetishes. For example, while men may readily reveal a �normal� predilection for legs, breasts, or bottoms, it is less likely that a fondness for feet would be admitted.

While North found publications circulating among individuals sharing this obsession, there was no subculture comparable to that of homosexuals or even sadomasochists. At the time he wrote (and it is doubtful whether this has changed radically) most rubber fetishists wanted a relationship involving rubber items with a consenting female, but extremely few women were interested: and these were either prostitutes catering to a niche market, or wives or partners introduced to rubber sex by their male partners. Thus there was very little motivation to join a community which would include few potential partners, but competitors for any possible partners available. Most of the rubber fetishists investigated by North contented themselves with fantasy and masturbation, sometimes with the aid of fetish products and special-interest publications. As a very private vice, it did not have the visibility or social implications of other transgressive sexual behaviours. The incorporation of fetish motifs into mainstream fashion, and the appearance of a few fashionable fetish clubs in major urban centres, is not necessarily any indicator of a wider acceptance of fetishism.

� Lesley A. Hall

Fetische

I adore your nose girl,
it is one of so many things which drew me to you
when I first saw your face.
Now, it is You that holds me stilled;
cautious with wondering;
pithed in place.

�Throw Away Poetry� for Eva by �PinnedByMind�
� Amanda 2012
8/18/2012

Woven work here - http://fav.me/d5bmmbi

____________________________________________

I tell stories in words and music and pictures; I am a cinematographer for those who read.
- Amanda Graham -




I am waiting.....Patiently.


Quote

Sex, as a physical act, is merely athletics, a momentary relief. What it needs to be powerful is desire, and the strongest element, that space between imagination and attainment that may only be traversed by longing, reaches beyond space and time.

Strangely enough, here and now is the past that somebody in the future is longing to go back to. Quote

The average american has sex 120 times a year and wishes to have more. Oh the things you learn in a sociology class! And I feel below average *le sigh. Quote

Only people and dolphins make love not only for direct purpose to have posterity, but for pleasure and fun also.

could the dolphins have sex with humans?

Quote

could the dolphins have sex with humans?





oh GOD at the screen names in your room tonight LMAO

*wikipedia and google "percentage of lesbians in any dolphin population"*

hmmm by reporting ALL same sex activity as 'homosexual' and avoiding gender identification they provide no real answer ... however... amusingly they did note the following

"The Amazon River dolphin or boto has been reported to form up in bands of 3�5 individuals enjoying group sex. The groups usually comprise young males and sometimes one or two females. Sex is often performed in non-reproductive ways, using snout, flippers and genital rubbing, without regards to gender.[57] In captivity, they have been observed to sometimes perform homosexual and heterosexual penetration of the blowhole, a hole homologous with the nostril of other mammals, making this the only known example of nasal sex in the animal kingdom.[57][58]"

Wikipedia here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals#Amazon_Dolphin

bah ... i think that the scientists are afraid of stimulating dolphin masturbation if they identify percentages by gender ...

care to have your blow hole stroked? ROFL Quote

omg ... this girl is WONDERFUL lol jesus i want to have her baby ...


http://www.vice.com/en_uk/vice/viceArticle/author/author_id/bertie-brandes/Article_page/4

especially Sex Pests 101 ROFLMFTO

Note: OMG Brad ... Home Page 'by Prices' option? ROFL (laughing with tears rolling down my pudgy cheeks)

*soupir* ahhh god @ this economy and its impacts Quote